Treatment Options

Evidence-based myopia control treatments: efficacy, mechanism, side effects, and clinical comparison

Myopia control treatments aim to slow axial elongation. No treatment "cures" myopia or reduces existing myopia; the goal is to brake progression, thereby reducing final myopia level and associated complication risk. The IMI 2021 Clinical Management Guidelines recommend early and active intervention.
01

Pharmacological: Low-Dose Atropine

27–67% SER slowing

Atropine is the most extensively researched myopia control agent. As a muscarinic receptor antagonist, it is thought to slow scleral remodeling. Applied as eye drops at low concentrations (0.01%–0.05%).

LAMP Study (Yam et al. 2019-2022)

This double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted in Hong Kong provides the gold-standard evidence for low-dose atropine:

  • Atropine 0.01%: 27% SER slowing at 1 year (however, MOSAIC and PEDIG studies failed to show significant effect in European and American children)
  • Atropine 0.025%: 43% SER slowing at 1 year
  • Atropine 0.05%: 67% SER slowing at 1 year; most effective dose, but pupil dilation and near blur side effects more pronounced
Side effects are dose-dependent: photosensitivity (discomfort in sunlight), near blur (especially at 0.05%), allergic conjunctivitis (rare). At 0.01%, side effects are equivalent to placebo.

Population Differences: Important Caveat

The MOSAIC study (Loughman et al. 2024, JAMA Ophthalmol) and PEDIG study (2023, JAMA Ophthalmol) have shown that atropine 0.01% does not provide clinically significant efficacy in European and American children. This indicates that efficacy demonstrated in East Asian populations cannot be generalized. MiyoLab's CDS system considers population differences and evaluates recommending 0.025% or 0.05% doses instead of 0.01% atropine monotherapy.

Yam et al. 2019 (LAMP Phase 1); Yam et al. 2020 (LAMP Phase 2); Yam et al. 2022 (LAMP Phase 3); MOSAIC: Loughman et al. 2024; PEDIG 2023; Tran 2020 (meta-analysis)
02

Orthokeratology (Ortho-K)

~45% axial slowing

Custom-designed gas permeable rigid contact lenses worn overnight temporarily reshape the corneal epithelium, eliminating the need for daytime lenses/glasses and slowing axial elongation by producing peripheral myopic defocus.

Sun et al. (2015) meta-analysis: Ortho-K slowed axial elongation by an average of 45% over 2 years. Efficacy is most pronounced in children with low-moderate myopia (−1 to −4 D).

Compliance rate of ~90% (LORIC study) is the highest among contact lens options. Because children wear them at night and remove them in the morning, no lens wearing is needed during school hours; suitable for active lifestyles.

Risks: Microbial keratitis risk of approximately 1/5,000-1/10,000 per year (minimized with proper hygiene and monitoring). Regular corneal topography monitoring is required.

Sun et al. 2015 (meta-analysis); Cho & Cheung 2012 (ROMIO); Hiraoka et al. 2012
03

MiSight® 1 day Contact Lens

~59% SER slowing

Developed by CooperVision, MiSight combines corrective and therapeutic (myopic defocus) zones in a center-distance design daily disposable soft contact lens. It is the first contact lens approved by the FDA with a myopia control indication.

Chamberlain et al. (2019): In a 3-year randomized controlled trial (n=144, ages 8-12), MiSight slowed myopia progression by 59% (SER) and axial elongation by 52%. Six-year long-term data shows sustained efficacy.

Daily disposable design minimizes hygiene risk and reduces parental concerns. Compliance rate ~85% (BLINK study).
Chamberlain et al. 2019 (Optom Vis Sci); Chamberlain et al. 2022 (6-year data)
04

Defocus Segment Spectacle Lenses (DIMS / HAL)

~52–67% slowing

Spectacle-based myopia control options for children who cannot or prefer not to wear contact lenses have been supported by strong evidence in recent years.

MiYOSMART (DIMS Technology, Hoya)

The lens center zone provides full myopia correction while hundreds of small surrounding segments produce +3.5 D myopic defocus. Lam et al. (2020, Br J Ophthalmol): In a 2-year RCT (n=183), SER progression was slowed by 52% and axial elongation by 62%.

Stellest (HAL Technology, Essilor)

Bao et al. (2022, JAMA Ophthalmol): In the HALT study, HAL (Highly Aspherical Lenslet) technology slowed SER by 55% and axial elongation by 51% over 2 years. Stellest 2.0 (HALT MAX, 2025) reports 58% efficacy.

Other Optical Treatments

  • SightGlass DOT (Rappon et al. 2023, CYPRESS): point-diffusion optical technology; 40% efficacy (conservative estimate)
  • ZEISS MyoCare (Chen et al. 2025, CARE RCT): multi-zone defocus; 48% SER slowing in Asia

Advantages of Spectacle Treatments

Non-invasive, no hygiene risk, applicable even in the youngest age groups (4-5 years). Highest compliance rate of any treatment modality (~93%, DIMS study). Minimal or no rebound effect (IMI 2025).

Lam et al. 2020 (Br J Ophthalmol); Bao et al. 2022 (JAMA Ophthalmol); Rappon et al. 2023 (CYPRESS); Chen et al. 2025 (CARE)
05

Combination Therapy

For patients with inadequate response to single treatment ("non-responder" or "partial responder"), combination therapy using different mechanisms may be applied.

Kinoshita et al. (2020): Ortho-K + atropine 0.01% combination slowed axial elongation by 74% over 2 years; significantly superior to ortho-K alone (45%).

Tan et al. (2023) network meta-analysis and the ASPECT (2025) study also support that pharmacological + optical treatment combinations are more effective than single treatments (ASPECT: DIMS + atropine = 61% axial slowing).

MiyoLab evaluates treatment response using Yam et al. (2020, LAMP-2) criteria: responder, partial responder, and non-responder. When non-response is detected, combination therapy or treatment change is recommended.

Kinoshita et al. 2020; Tan et al. 2023 (network meta-analysis); ASPECT 2025; Yam et al. 2020 (LAMP-2)
06

Rebound Effect: What Happens When Treatment Stops?

Some myopia control treatments (especially atropine) may show temporary acceleration of myopia progression ("rebound") when discontinued. This effect is dose-dependent:

  • Atropine 0.5% (high dose): significant rebound on cessation; the ATOM-1 study showed much of the treatment benefit was lost to rebound (Tong et al. 2009)
  • Atropine 0.1%: moderate rebound (Chia et al. 2014, ATOM-2)
  • Atropine 0.01%–0.05%: low-minimal rebound (Yam et al. 2022, LAMP Phase 3). However, gradual tapering is recommended
  • Ortho-K: cornea returns to original shape on cessation but axial slowing is permanent; no significant rebound reported
  • DIMS / HAL spectacles: minimal or zero rebound (IMI 2025)
In MiyoLab's prognosis model, rebound effect is automatically factored into treatment discontinuation or modification scenarios. This ensures realistic prognosis projections.
Tong et al. 2009 (ATOM-1); Chia et al. 2014 (ATOM-2); Yam et al. 2022 (LAMP Phase 3); IMI 2025
07

Lifestyle: Outdoor Time

Outdoor time has the strongest evidence for reducing myopia onset risk among lifestyle interventions. It is positioned as a prevention and supportive strategy, not a treatment.

He et al. (2015, JAMA): 40 minutes of additional outdoor activity per day reduced myopia incidence by 23% over 3 years. Rose et al. (2008): Spending a total of 2+ hours outdoors daily reduces myopia onset risk by ~50%.

Evidence for slowing established myopia is limited. However, outdoor time is recommended for all myopic children as a treatment support measure. In MiyoLab's risk score, outdoor time is calculated as a protective factor.
He et al. 2015 (JAMA); Rose et al. 2008; Wu et al. 2013
08

Treatment Efficacy Comparison

TreatmentSER SlowingAL SlowingSourceEvidence Level
Atropine 0.05%67%LAMP (Yam 2019)RCT
Atropine 0.025%43%LAMP (Yam 2019)RCT
Atropine 0.01%27%LAMP (Yam 2019)RCT
Ortho-K45%Sun 2015 metaMeta-analysis
MiSight CL59%52%Chamberlain 2019RCT
DIMS (MiYOSMART)52%62%Lam 2020RCT
HAL (Stellest)55%51%Bao 2022RCT
Ortho-K + Atropine74%Kinoshita 2020RCT
View All References →